GFI vs. KGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFI or KGC.
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and KGC is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GFI vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GFI:
1.00
KGC:
2.54
GFI:
1.46
KGC:
2.90
GFI:
1.19
KGC:
1.39
GFI:
1.47
KGC:
1.35
GFI:
2.90
KGC:
17.25
GFI:
15.36%
KGC:
6.02%
GFI:
44.37%
KGC:
40.88%
GFI:
-86.05%
KGC:
-96.04%
GFI:
-0.48%
KGC:
-52.52%
Fundamentals
GFI:
$12.55B
KGC:
$15.61B
GFI:
$0.71
KGC:
$0.77
GFI:
19.75
KGC:
16.48
GFI:
0.00
KGC:
-3.90
GFI:
$5.20B
KGC:
$4.29B
GFI:
$2.58B
KGC:
$2.07B
GFI:
$2.71B
KGC:
$2.48B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a 74.84% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's 36.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed KGC with an annualized return of 20.39%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively lower 19.09% annualized return.
GFI
74.84%
21.34%
47.28%
39.39%
38.70%
20.39%
KGC
36.89%
14.02%
33.16%
99.36%
23.54%
19.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFI vs. KGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GFI
KGC
GFI vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFI vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than KGC's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2.40% | 2.94% | 2.86% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.73% | 0.80% | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.69% | 0.72% | 0.86% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.47% | 0.97% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.07% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GFI vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -86.05%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and KGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFI vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 10.39%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GFI vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities