PortfoliosLab logo
GFI vs. KGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and KGC is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GFI vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GFI:

0.74

KGC:

1.81

Sortino Ratio

GFI:

1.39

KGC:

2.40

Omega Ratio

GFI:

1.18

KGC:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

GFI:

1.44

KGC:

1.18

Martin Ratio

GFI:

3.17

KGC:

13.54

Ulcer Index

GFI:

13.75%

KGC:

6.32%

Daily Std Dev

GFI:

47.99%

KGC:

43.67%

Max Drawdown

GFI:

-86.05%

KGC:

-96.04%

Current Drawdown

GFI:

-10.86%

KGC:

-45.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFI:

$19.05B

KGC:

$17.18B

EPS

GFI:

$1.38

KGC:

$0.98

PE Ratio

GFI:

15.42

KGC:

14.24

PEG Ratio

GFI:

0.00

KGC:

-3.90

PS Ratio

GFI:

3.66

KGC:

3.09

PB Ratio

GFI:

3.55

KGC:

2.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFI:

$5.20B

KGC:

$5.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFI:

$2.58B

KGC:

$2.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

GFI:

$2.71B

KGC:

$3.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a 69.75% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's 55.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed KGC with an annualized return of 23.11%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively lower 20.74% annualized return.


GFI

YTD

69.75%

1M

-8.34%

6M

49.48%

1Y

35.00%

3Y*

28.69%

5Y*

25.89%

10Y*

23.11%

KGC

YTD

55.44%

1M

-2.91%

6M

44.52%

1Y

78.35%

3Y*

50.59%

5Y*

17.28%

10Y*

20.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gold Fields Limited

Kinross Gold Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GFI vs. KGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GFI is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GFI is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GFI is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GFI is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GFI is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GFI is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

KGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KGC is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KGC is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KGC is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KGC is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KGC is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KGC is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GFI vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFI and KGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GFI vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than KGC's 0.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
2.47%2.94%2.86%3.40%3.24%1.73%0.80%1.62%1.77%1.69%0.72%0.86%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.84%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.07%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GFI vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -86.05%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and KGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GFI vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 18.54% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 15.14%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GFI vs. KGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
3.08B
1.50B
(GFI) Total Revenue
(KGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GFI vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gold Fields Limited and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
60.1%
44.2%
(GFI) Gross Margin
(KGC) Gross Margin
GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 3.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.1%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 662.40M and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 1.77B and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 57.5%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 570.40M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.1%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 856.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.