CCJ vs. DNN

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly higher than DNN's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has outperformed DNN with an annualized return of 11.86%, while DNN has yielded a comparatively lower 5.99% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Denison Mines Corp. (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the DNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and DNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while DNN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.87%, smaller than the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and DNN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 10.77%, while Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) has a volatility of 13.64%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Denison Mines Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.