GFI vs. AEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFI or AEM.
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and AEM is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GFI vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GFI:
-0.26
AEM:
1.52
GFI:
-0.05
AEM:
2.02
GFI:
0.99
AEM:
1.25
GFI:
-0.44
AEM:
1.08
GFI:
-0.80
AEM:
7.14
GFI:
15.51%
AEM:
6.47%
GFI:
47.69%
AEM:
30.35%
GFI:
-86.06%
AEM:
-90.33%
GFI:
-27.82%
AEM:
-12.06%
Fundamentals
GFI:
$12.55B
AEM:
$41.22B
GFI:
$0.71
AEM:
$1.98
GFI:
19.75
AEM:
41.28
GFI:
0.00
AEM:
28.15
GFI:
$4.36B
AEM:
$7.88B
GFI:
$1.11B
AEM:
$3.06B
GFI:
$1.89B
AEM:
$3.38B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 45.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GFI having a 14.55% annualized return and AEM not far behind at 14.13%.
GFI
-3.06%
-6.12%
-1.45%
-13.95%
21.75%
14.55%
AEM
45.20%
-2.32%
21.52%
43.65%
8.83%
14.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFI vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFI vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than AEM's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2.84% | 2.86% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.73% | 0.80% | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.69% | 0.72% | 0.86% | 2.66% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 2.06% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.29% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
GFI vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -86.06%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and AEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFI vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is 9.02%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that GFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GFI vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities