CCFE vs. IMCV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV).

CCFE and IMCV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCFE is an actively managed fund by Concourse Capital. It was launched on Jun 11, 2025. IMCV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.

Performance

CCFE vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCFE vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF	-2.65%	7.81%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	3.40%	11.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCFE achieves a -2.65% return, which is significantly lower than IMCV's 3.40% return.

CCFE

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -14.58%
• YTD: -2.65%
• 6M: -6.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMCV

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -4.62%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 10.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCFE vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCFE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.

CCFE

Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF

IMCV

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

Return for Risk

CCFE vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCV

IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 59
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCFE vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCFE	IMCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.46	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between CCFE and IMCV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CCFE vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

CCFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than IMCV's 2.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	2.06%	2.23%	2.36%	2.30%	2.36%	1.86%	2.61%	2.45%	2.61%	1.87%	2.09%	2.29%

Drawdowns

CCFE vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCFE drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFE and IMCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCFE	IMCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-64.74%	+43.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.66%	-4.65%	-14.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-8.47%	+3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCFE	IMCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	16.93%	+7.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.50%	16.73%	+7.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.50%	19.69%	+4.81%