PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCFE vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCFE vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCFE achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than VFVA's 16.13% return.


CCFE

1D
-1.09%
1M
-5.78%
6M
-5.32%
YTD
0.63%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFVA

1D
0.74%
1M
2.85%
6M
12.23%
YTD
16.13%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCFE vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
0.63%6.24%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
16.13%14.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CCFE and VFVA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.74

The correlation between CCFE and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCFE vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCFE
CCFE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CCFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCFE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CCFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCFE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCFE vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCFEVFVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.32

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

3.21

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

10.27

-9.98

CCFE vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCFE and VFVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCFE vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCFE drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFE and VFVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCFEVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.15%

-48.58%

+27.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.15%

-8.55%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.91%

0.00%

-15.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-7.28%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

2.67%

+6.84%

Volatility

CCFE vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) at 4.10%. This indicates that CCFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCFEVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

4.10%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.72%

10.01%

+8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.53%

15.07%

+9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.23%

20.09%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

24.25%

-0.02%

CCFE vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCFE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCFE vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

CCFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than VFVA's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.82%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCFE and VFVA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCFE has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to VFVA (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCFE dropped -21.15% vs VFVA's -48.58%.

On 1-year performance, VFVA leads with 27.35% vs 2.73% for CCFE. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFVA has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 27.35% return vs 2.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CCFE.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.02% for CCFE.

They also come from different issuers: Concourse Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CCFE and 0.13% for VFVA.

VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCFE and VFVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer