PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCFE vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCFE vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCFE achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's -0.50% return.


CCFE

1D
-1.72%
1M
1.00%
YTD
2.37%
6M
0.64%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDE

1D
-3.14%
1M
-10.04%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-5.03%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
40.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCFE vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CCFE and GDE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCFE vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCFE
CCFE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CCFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCFE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CCFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCFE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCFE vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCFEGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.65

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

4.59

-3.22

CCFE vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCFE and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCFE vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCFE drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFE and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCFEGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.15%

-32.01%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.15%

-22.66%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.46%

-19.50%

+5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-7.97%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

8.12%

+0.80%

Volatility

CCFE vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) is 6.56%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that CCFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCFEGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

11.41%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

26.51%

-7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.59%

30.33%

-5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

27.15%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

27.15%

-2.66%

CCFE vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCFE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCFE vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

CCFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than GDE's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.34%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCFE and GDE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to CCFE (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCFE dropped -21.15% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 37.19% vs 12.20% for CCFE. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CCFE has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 37.19% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CCFE.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.02% for CCFE.

CCFE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Concourse Capital and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CCFE and 0.20% for GDE.

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCFE and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer