PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBSE vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBSE vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBSE achieves a 32.18% return, which is significantly higher than MGV's 13.14% return.


CBSE

1D
-0.93%
1M
10.89%
YTD
32.18%
6M
29.85%
1Y
51.66%
3Y*
31.65%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*

MGV

1D
0.08%
1M
5.09%
YTD
13.14%
6M
13.88%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBSE vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
32.18%19.53%32.20%17.29%-19.92%14.57%16.87%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
13.14%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CBSE and MGV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.64

The correlation between CBSE and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBSE vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBSE vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBSEMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

4.22

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

16.07

-4.48

CBSE vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBSE and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBSEMGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.76

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.88

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.48

+0.32

Drawdowns

CBSE vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBSE drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSE and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBSEMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-55.87%

+19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-6.42%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-13.18%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-16.54%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

0.00%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-7.70%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

1.68%

+2.79%

Volatility

CBSE vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.46%. This indicates that CBSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBSEMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

2.46%

+5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

7.46%

+10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

9.83%

+12.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.06%

13.56%

+10.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.79%

16.33%

+7.46%

CBSE vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBSE vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

CBSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than MGV's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.26%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBSE and MGV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBSE has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to MGV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSE dropped -36.30% vs MGV's -55.87%.

On 5-year performance, CBSE leads with 12.52% vs 11.92% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CBSE has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.26% for CBSE.

They also come from different issuers: Clough and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CBSE and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBSE and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer