PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBSE vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBSE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBSE achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 12.26% return.


CBSE

1D
0.48%
1M
-8.06%
6M
10.14%
YTD
17.44%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.07%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$202.38K$195.77K$371.19K
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B

CBSE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
17.44%19.53%32.20%17.29%-19.92%14.57%17.27%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CBSE and QQQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.71

The correlation between CBSE and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBSE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBSE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBSEQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.88

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

6.00

-1.96

CBSE vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBSE and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBSE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBSE drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSE and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBSEQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-82.97%

+46.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-11.96%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-22.77%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-35.12%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.97%

-7.69%

-4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-32.62%

+20.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

3.74%

+1.50%

Volatility

CBSE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) is 5.71%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that CBSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBSEQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

6.87%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.76%

16.08%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.56%

19.38%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

22.90%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.07%

22.50%

+1.57%

CBSE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBSE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CBSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.29%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBSE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to CBSE (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSE dropped -36.30% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs 10.41% for CBSE. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CBSE has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.29% for CBSE.

CBSE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Clough and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CBSE and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBSE and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer