CBL vs. MTZ
CBL (CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.) and MTZ (MasTec, Inc.) are both stocks. Over the past 3 years, CBL returned 46.71%/yr vs 38.89%/yr for MTZ. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CBL vs. MTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBL achieves a 57.62% return, which is significantly higher than MTZ's 22.72% return.
CBL
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 63.55%
- YTD
- 57.62%
- 1Y
- 114.58%
- 3Y*
- 46.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.53%
MTZ
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -29.92%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- 22.72%
- 1Y
- 50.11%
- 3Y*
- 38.89%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 25.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.39M | $16.32M | $15.52M | |
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | $498.31M | $471.08M | $466.80M |
CBL vs. MTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. | 57.62% | 37.21% | 28.52% | 12.96% | -17.96% | 18.86% |
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | 22.72% | 59.67% | 79.79% | -11.26% | -7.53% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBL and MTZ is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between CBL and MTZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CBL:
$1.75B
MTZ:
$21.42B
CBL:
$5.56
MTZ:
$6.39
CBL:
10.19
MTZ:
41.75
CBL:
0.04
MTZ:
0.40
CBL:
3.02
MTZ:
1.30
CBL:
4.37
MTZ:
6.05
CBL:
$582.57M
MTZ:
$16.11B
CBL:
$139.43M
MTZ:
$1.85B
CBL:
$413.31M
MTZ:
$1.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBL vs. MTZ — Risk / Return Rank
CBL
MTZ
CBL vs. MTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBL | MTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.21 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.31 | 1.25 | +8.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.15 | 5.08 | +25.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBL vs. MTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBL drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum MTZ drawdown of -97.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBL and MTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBL | MTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.02% | -97.72% | +63.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -40.29% | +27.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | -52.75% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -39.03% | +33.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -51.75% | +39.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 9.89% | -6.09% |
Volatility
CBL vs. MTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) is 8.26%, while MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) has a volatility of 29.99%. This indicates that CBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBL | MTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.26% | 29.99% | -21.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.05% | 43.51% | -22.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.12% | 50.12% | -22.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.34% | 44.86% | -12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.34% | 44.60% | -12.26% |
Dividends
CBL vs. MTZ - Dividend Comparison
CBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, while MTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. | 3.79% | 6.76% | 5.44% | 6.14% | 12.78% |
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CBL vs. MTZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and MasTec, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBL vs. MTZ - Profitability Comparison
CBL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.34M and revenue of 145.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.
MTZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 556.28M and revenue of 4.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.7%.
CBL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 72.75M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.8%.
MTZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 226.20M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
CBL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 45.40M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
MTZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 130.12M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBL and MTZ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTZ has higher volatility (29.99%) compared to CBL (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBL dropped -34.02% vs MTZ's -97.72%.
CBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBL and MTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer