PortfoliosLab logo
MTZ vs. STRL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MTZ and STRL is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MTZ vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTZ:

1.02

STRL:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

MTZ:

1.51

STRL:

1.17

Omega Ratio

MTZ:

1.21

STRL:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

MTZ:

1.38

STRL:

0.78

Martin Ratio

MTZ:

3.78

STRL:

1.82

Ulcer Index

MTZ:

12.45%

STRL:

20.40%

Daily Std Dev

MTZ:

46.01%

STRL:

62.23%

Max Drawdown

MTZ:

-97.72%

STRL:

-92.51%

Current Drawdown

MTZ:

-2.13%

STRL:

-7.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTZ:

$12.45B

STRL:

$5.73B

EPS

MTZ:

$2.71

STRL:

$8.54

PE Ratio

MTZ:

58.22

STRL:

22.08

PEG Ratio

MTZ:

0.74

STRL:

1.59

PS Ratio

MTZ:

1.00

STRL:

2.72

PB Ratio

MTZ:

4.32

STRL:

7.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTZ:

$12.46B

STRL:

$2.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTZ:

$1.50B

STRL:

$439.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTZ:

$948.13M

STRL:

$437.53M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTZ achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than STRL's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MTZ has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 24.43%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 48.03% annualized return.


MTZ

YTD

15.59%

1M

35.24%

6M

13.63%

1Y

46.61%

3Y*

25.17%

5Y*

33.11%

10Y*

24.43%

STRL

YTD

10.41%

1M

32.59%

6M

0.12%

1Y

44.33%

3Y*

99.56%

5Y*

84.97%

10Y*

48.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MasTec, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTZ vs. STRL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTZ is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTZ is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTZ is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTZ is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTZ is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTZ is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STRL is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STRL is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STRL is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STRL is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STRL is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STRL is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTZ vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTZ and STRL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MTZ vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTZ nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MTZ vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTZ drawdown since its inception was -97.72%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTZ and STRL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MTZ vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) is 9.94%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 13.43%. This indicates that MTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MTZ vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MasTec, Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.85B
430.95M
(MTZ) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTZ vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MasTec, Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
10.9%
22.0%
(MTZ) Gross Margin
(STRL) Gross Margin
MTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 311.10M and revenue of 2.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.84M and revenue of 430.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

MTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 144.93M and revenue of 2.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.08M and revenue of 430.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

MTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 9.90M and revenue of 2.85B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 39.48M and revenue of 430.95M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.