MTZ vs. STRL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL).

Performance

MTZ vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTZ vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTZ MasTec, Inc.	48.01%	59.67%	79.79%	-11.26%	-7.53%	35.35%	6.27%	58.19%	-17.14%	27.97%
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc.	32.99%	81.79%	91.57%	168.08%	24.71%	41.32%	32.17%	29.29%	-33.11%	92.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MTZ : $25.33B STRL : $12.69B
EPS MTZ : $5.06 STRL : $9.37
PE Ratio MTZ : 63.54 STRL : 43.46
PEG Ratio MTZ : 0.60 STRL : 0.93
PS Ratio MTZ : 1.77 STRL : 5.06
PB Ratio MTZ : 7.60 STRL : 11.45
Total Revenue (TTM) MTZ : $14.30B STRL : $2.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) MTZ : $1.79B STRL : $572.31M
EBITDA (TTM) MTZ : $1.10B STRL : $479.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTZ achieves a 48.01% return, which is significantly higher than STRL's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MTZ has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 31.86%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 54.90% annualized return.

MTZ

• 1D: 5.21%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 48.01%
• 6M: 51.19%
• 1Y: 175.67%
• 3Y*: 50.47%
• 5Y*: 27.69%
• 10Y*: 31.86%

STRL

• 1D: 6.46%
• 1M: -4.87%
• YTD: 32.99%
• 6M: 19.90%
• 1Y: 259.75%
• 3Y*: 120.71%
• 5Y*: 77.46%
• 10Y*: 54.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTZ vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTZ

MTZ Risk / Return Rank: 98
MTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

STRL

STRL Risk / Return Rank: 97
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTZ vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTZ	STRL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.32	4.39	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	3.82	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.52	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.68	8.08	+4.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	37.92	23.59	+14.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTZ vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTZ Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is comparable to the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTZ and STRL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTZ	STRL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.32	4.39	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	1.54	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	1.09	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.23	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between MTZ and STRL is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MTZ vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTZ nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MTZ vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTZ drawdown since its inception was -97.72%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTZ and STRL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTZ	STRL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.72%	-92.51%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.13%	-31.02%	+16.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.01%	-47.67%	-13.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.92%	-59.60%	-8.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-11.41%	+10.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.14%	-46.56%	-5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	10.62%	-5.90%

Volatility

MTZ vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) is 14.12%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 21.20%. This indicates that MTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTZ	STRL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.12%	21.20%	-7.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.41%	46.74%	-17.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.95%	59.69%	-18.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.17%	50.46%	-8.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.63%	50.44%	-6.81%

Financials

MTZ vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MasTec, Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 508.34M and revenue of 3.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.12M and revenue of 755.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.

MTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 319.21M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 119.97M and revenue of 755.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

MTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 142.71M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 87.60M and revenue of 755.61M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.