MTZ vs. DY
MTZ (MasTec, Inc.) and DY (Dycom Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MTZ returned 33.76%/yr vs 18.36%/yr for DY. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTZ vs. DY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTZ achieves a 86.93% return, which is significantly higher than DY's 38.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MTZ has outperformed DY with an annualized return of 33.76%, while DY has yielded a comparatively lower 18.36% annualized return.
MTZ
- 1D
- 7.02%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 86.93%
- 6M
- 80.92%
- 1Y
- 148.19%
- 3Y*
- 54.33%
- 5Y*
- 31.50%
- 10Y*
- 33.76%
DY
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 38.51%
- 6M
- 34.83%
- 1Y
- 100.00%
- 3Y*
- 64.79%
- 5Y*
- 45.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.36%
MTZ vs. DY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | 86.93% | 59.67% | 79.79% | -11.26% | -7.53% | 35.35% | 6.27% | 58.19% | -17.14% | 27.97% |
DY Dycom Industries, Inc. | 38.51% | 94.13% | 51.24% | 22.96% | -0.17% | 24.15% | 60.17% | -12.75% | -51.50% | 38.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTZ and DY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1990 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, MTZ and DY have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MTZ:
$32.01B
DY:
$14.22B
MTZ:
$5.71
DY:
$10.52
MTZ:
71.16
DY:
44.47
MTZ:
0.67
DY:
0.63
MTZ:
2.10
DY:
2.22
MTZ:
9.67
DY:
7.50
MTZ:
$15.28B
DY:
$6.25B
MTZ:
$1.85B
DY:
$1.23B
MTZ:
$1.10B
DY:
$1.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTZ vs. DY — Risk / Return Rank
MTZ
DY
MTZ vs. DY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTZ | DY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.39 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.40 | 4.12 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.42 | 13.11 | +10.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTZ vs. DY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTZ drawdown since its inception was -97.72%, roughly equal to the maximum DY drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTZ and DY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTZ | DY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.72% | -93.54% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.30% | -24.43% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.01% | -32.58% | -28.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.01% | -33.70% | -27.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.92% | -89.01% | +21.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -12.55% | +5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.86% | -45.65% | -6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 7.65% | -1.30% |
Volatility
MTZ vs. DY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) is 13.63%, while Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) has a volatility of 25.59%. This indicates that MTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTZ | DY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.63% | 25.59% | -11.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.17% | 37.98% | -7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.90% | 45.79% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.72% | 43.42% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.86% | 52.96% | -9.10% |
Dividends
MTZ vs. DY - Dividend Comparison
Neither MTZ nor DY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MTZ vs. DY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MasTec, Inc. and Dycom Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTZ vs. DY - Profitability Comparison
MTZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 477.90M and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.
DY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.
MTZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.80M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
DY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
MTZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 60.84M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.
DY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTZ and DY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DY has higher volatility (25.59%) compared to MTZ (13.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTZ dropped -97.72% vs DY's -93.54%.
MTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTZ and DY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer