PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBL vs. CVNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBL vs. CVNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and Carvana Co. (CVNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBL achieves a 30.40% return, which is significantly higher than CVNA's -24.59% return.


CBL

1D
-2.08%
1M
9.63%
YTD
30.40%
6M
40.22%
1Y
102.26%
3Y*
35.59%
5Y*
10Y*

CVNA

1D
-2.97%
1M
-15.48%
YTD
-24.59%
6M
-19.43%
1Y
-6.43%
3Y*
172.78%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBL vs. CVNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
30.40%37.21%28.52%12.96%-17.96%4.00%
CVNA
Carvana Co.
-24.59%107.52%284.13%1,016.88%-97.96%-22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CBL and CVNA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.23

The correlation between CBL and CVNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBL:

$1.46B

CVNA:

$9.43B

EPS

CBL:

$5.57

CVNA:

$8.69

PE Ratio

CBL:

8.52

CVNA:

7.32

PEG Ratio

CBL:

0.03

CVNA:

0.03

PS Ratio

CBL:

2.52

CVNA:

0.47

PB Ratio

CBL:

3.66

CVNA:

2.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBL:

$582.57M

CVNA:

$22.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBL:

$139.43M

CVNA:

$4.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

CBL:

$413.31M

CVNA:

-$116.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBL vs. CVNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBL
CBL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CVNA
CVNA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CVNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNA Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBL vs. CVNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and Carvana Co. (CVNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBLCVNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.03

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.31

-0.16

+8.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.04

-0.35

+28.39

CBL vs. CVNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBL Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is higher than the CVNA Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBL and CVNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBLCVNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86

-0.11

+3.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.45

+0.15

Drawdowns

CBL vs. CVNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBL drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum CVNA drawdown of -98.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBL and CVNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLCVNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-98.99%

+64.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-41.21%

+28.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-53.47%

+24.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-33.48%

+31.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-38.11%

+25.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

18.24%

-14.59%

Volatility

CBL vs. CVNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) is 9.43%, while Carvana Co. (CVNA) has a volatility of 15.52%. This indicates that CBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLCVNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

15.52%

-6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.66%

43.03%

-23.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.49%

59.47%

-32.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.65%

111.18%

-79.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.65%

99.27%

-67.62%

Dividends

CBL vs. CVNA - Dividend Comparison

CBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while CVNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
4.05%6.76%5.44%6.14%12.78%
CVNA
Carvana Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CBL vs. CVNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and Carvana Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
145.97M
6.43B
(CBL) Total Revenue
(CVNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CBL vs. CVNA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and Carvana Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
62.6%
19.8%
Portfolio components
CBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.34M and revenue of 145.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

CVNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 6.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

CBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 72.75M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.8%.

CVNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported an operating income of 581.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

CBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 45.40M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.

CVNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a net income of 250.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBL and CVNA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVNA has higher volatility (15.52%) compared to CBL (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBL dropped -34.02% vs CVNA's -98.99%.

CBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBL and CVNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer