MTZ vs. PWR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).

Performance

MTZ vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTZ vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTZ MasTec, Inc.	48.01%	59.67%	79.79%	-11.26%	-7.53%	35.35%	6.27%	58.19%	-17.14%	27.97%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	30.11%	33.70%	46.60%	51.70%	24.63%	59.50%	77.74%	35.84%	-22.93%	12.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MTZ : $25.33B PWR : $83.28B
EPS MTZ : $5.06 PWR : $6.79
PE Ratio MTZ : 63.54 PWR : 80.81
PEG Ratio MTZ : 0.60 PWR : 4.00
PS Ratio MTZ : 1.77 PWR : 2.93
PB Ratio MTZ : 7.60 PWR : 9.32
Total Revenue (TTM) MTZ : $14.30B PWR : $28.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) MTZ : $1.79B PWR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) MTZ : $1.10B PWR : $2.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTZ achieves a 48.01% return, which is significantly higher than PWR's 30.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MTZ has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 31.86%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 37.93% annualized return.

MTZ

• 1D: 5.21%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 48.01%
• 6M: 51.19%
• 1Y: 175.67%
• 3Y*: 50.47%
• 5Y*: 27.69%
• 10Y*: 31.86%

PWR

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 30.11%
• 6M: 32.55%
• 1Y: 116.24%
• 3Y*: 49.01%
• 5Y*: 44.09%
• 10Y*: 37.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTZ vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTZ

MTZ Risk / Return Rank: 98
MTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTZ vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTZ	PWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.32	3.29	+1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	3.82	+0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.52	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.68	9.96	+2.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	37.92	24.49	+13.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTZ vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTZ Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is higher than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTZ and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTZ	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.32	3.29	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	1.28	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	1.15	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.33	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between MTZ and PWR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MTZ vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

MTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MTZ MasTec, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.07%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%

Drawdowns

MTZ vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTZ drawdown since its inception was -97.72%, roughly equal to the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTZ and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTZ	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.72%	-97.07%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.13%	-11.66%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.01%	-33.89%	-27.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.92%	-45.53%	-22.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-5.09%	+4.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.14%	-47.15%	-4.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	4.74%	-0.02%

Volatility

MTZ vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) has a higher volatility of 14.12% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 11.17%. This indicates that MTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTZ	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.12%	11.17%	+2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.41%	26.43%	+2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.95%	35.55%	+5.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.17%	34.66%	+7.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.63%	33.20%	+10.43%

Financials

MTZ vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MasTec, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 508.34M and revenue of 3.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 985.00M and revenue of 7.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

MTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 319.21M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

MTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 142.71M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.