MTZ vs. PWR
MTZ (MasTec, Inc.) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MTZ returned 32.14%/yr vs 40.93%/yr for PWR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTZ vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MTZ having a 70.06% return and PWR slightly lower at 69.64%. Over the past 10 years, MTZ has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 32.14%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 40.93% annualized return.
MTZ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -13.10%
- YTD
- 70.06%
- 6M
- 69.34%
- 1Y
- 131.60%
- 3Y*
- 51.82%
- 5Y*
- 25.35%
- 10Y*
- 32.14%
PWR
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 69.64%
- 6M
- 57.01%
- 1Y
- 100.95%
- 3Y*
- 58.60%
- 5Y*
- 50.60%
- 10Y*
- 40.93%
MTZ vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | 70.06% | 59.67% | 79.79% | -11.26% | -7.53% | 35.35% | 6.27% | 58.19% | -17.14% | 27.97% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 69.64% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTZ and PWR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 1998 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, MTZ and PWR have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MTZ:
$29.12B
PWR:
$108.84B
MTZ:
$5.71
PWR:
$7.29
MTZ:
64.74
PWR:
98.17
MTZ:
0.61
PWR:
4.86
MTZ:
1.91
PWR:
3.62
MTZ:
8.80
PWR:
12.03
MTZ:
$15.28B
PWR:
$29.99B
MTZ:
$1.85B
PWR:
$4.08B
MTZ:
$1.10B
PWR:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTZ vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
MTZ
PWR
MTZ vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTZ | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.68 | 8.15 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.13 | 20.17 | +4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTZ | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45 | 2.81 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 1.43 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 1.22 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.35 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
MTZ vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTZ drawdown since its inception was -97.72%, roughly equal to the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTZ and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTZ | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.72% | -97.07% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.24% | -12.45% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.01% | -33.89% | -27.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.01% | -33.89% | -27.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.92% | -45.53% | -22.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.51% | -8.86% | -6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -46.88% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 5.02% | +0.24% |
Volatility
MTZ vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) have volatilities of 12.32% and 11.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTZ | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.32% | 11.90% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.09% | 29.40% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.38% | 36.23% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.55% | 35.60% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.74% | 33.69% | +10.05% |
Dividends
MTZ vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
MTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
Financials
MTZ vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MasTec, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTZ vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison
MTZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 477.90M and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
MTZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.80M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
MTZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 60.84M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTZ and PWR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTZ has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to PWR (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTZ dropped -97.72% vs PWR's -97.07%.
MTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTZ and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer