PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBL vs. ARCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBL vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBL achieves a 30.54% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -4.02% return.


CBL

1D
0.11%
1M
8.57%
YTD
30.54%
6M
35.64%
1Y
103.20%
3Y*
35.85%
5Y*
10Y*

ARCC

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-5.00%
1Y
-5.35%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBL vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
30.54%37.21%28.52%12.96%-17.96%4.00%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-4.02%1.07%19.78%20.03%-3.84%2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CBL and ARCC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBL:

$1.46B

ARCC:

$13.57B

EPS

CBL:

$5.57

ARCC:

$1.63

PE Ratio

CBL:

8.53

ARCC:

11.59

PEG Ratio

CBL:

0.03

ARCC:

1.74

PS Ratio

CBL:

2.53

ARCC:

5.06

PB Ratio

CBL:

3.66

ARCC:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBL:

$582.57M

ARCC:

$2.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBL:

$139.43M

ARCC:

$1.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

CBL:

$413.31M

ARCC:

$2.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBL vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBL
CBL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBL vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBLARCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

0.97

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.38

-0.28

+8.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.28

-0.51

+28.79

CBL vs. ARCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBL Sharpe Ratio is 3.90, which is higher than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBL and ARCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBLARCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90

-0.29

+4.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.38

+0.23

Drawdowns

CBL vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBL drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBL and ARCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLARCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-79.36%

+45.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-19.35%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-19.35%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-12.64%

+10.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-9.10%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

10.51%

-6.86%

Volatility

CBL vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 4.02%. This indicates that CBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLARCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

4.02%

+5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.44%

14.76%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

18.44%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.64%

19.97%

+11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.64%

25.58%

+6.06%

Dividends

CBL vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

CBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than ARCC's 10.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
10.16%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
4.05%6.76%5.44%6.14%12.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CBL vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
145.97M
763.00M
(CBL) Total Revenue
(ARCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CBL vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
62.6%
72.1%
Portfolio components
CBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.34M and revenue of 145.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

ARCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 550.00M and revenue of 763.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

CBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 72.75M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.8%.

ARCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 404.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.

CBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 45.40M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.

ARCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBL and ARCC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBL has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to ARCC (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBL dropped -34.02% vs ARCC's -79.36%.

CBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBL and ARCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer