PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBL vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBL achieves a 63.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 12.26% return.


CBL

1D
0.74%
1M
11.55%
6M
68.77%
YTD
63.30%
1Y
133.93%
3Y*
48.81%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.56%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.26M$16.78M$15.02M
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B

CBL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
63.30%37.21%28.52%12.96%-17.96%18.86%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CBL and QQQ is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between CBL and QQQ has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBL
CBL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBLQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.21

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.53

1.88

+8.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.46

6.00

+28.46

CBL vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBL Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBL and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBL drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBL and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-82.97%

+48.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-11.96%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-22.77%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-7.69%

+5.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-32.62%

+20.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.74%

+0.02%

Volatility

CBL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that CBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

6.87%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.97%

16.08%

+4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.00%

19.38%

+8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.35%

22.90%

+9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.35%

22.50%

+9.85%

Dividends

CBL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
3.66%6.76%5.44%6.14%12.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBL has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBL dropped -34.02% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

CBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBL and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer