PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTZ vs. ACM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MTZACM
YTD Return91.61%21.87%
1Y Return194.54%40.26%
3Y Return (Ann)14.98%17.52%
5Y Return (Ann)15.41%22.17%
10Y Return (Ann)19.22%13.53%
Sharpe Ratio4.941.99
Sortino Ratio5.052.94
Omega Ratio1.641.36
Calmar Ratio3.432.78
Martin Ratio37.047.64
Ulcer Index5.53%5.78%
Daily Std Dev41.44%22.13%
Max Drawdown-97.72%-59.97%
Current Drawdown0.00%-2.23%

Fundamentals


MTZACM
Market Cap$11.50B$14.96B
EPS$1.13$2.71
PE Ratio128.4041.17
PEG Ratio1.020.36
Total Revenue (TTM)$12.18B$12.00B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.13B$790.19M
EBITDA (TTM)$890.00M$793.19M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MTZ and ACM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MTZ vs. ACM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MTZ achieves a 91.61% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's 21.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MTZ has outperformed ACM with an annualized return of 19.22%, while ACM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
35.62%
21.86%
MTZ
ACM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTZ vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTZ, currently valued at 4.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.94
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTZ, currently valued at 5.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MTZ, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.64
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTZ, currently valued at 3.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MTZ, currently valued at 37.04, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0037.04
ACM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACM, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACM, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACM, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACM, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACM, currently valued at 7.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.64

MTZ vs. ACM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTZ Sharpe Ratio is 4.94, which is higher than the ACM Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTZ and ACM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.94
1.99
MTZ
ACM

Dividends

MTZ vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison

MTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.


TTM20232022
MTZ
MasTec, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACM
AECOM
0.79%0.78%0.71%

Drawdowns

MTZ vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTZ drawdown since its inception was -97.72%, which is greater than ACM's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTZ and ACM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-2.23%
MTZ
ACM

Volatility

MTZ vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison

MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to AECOM (ACM) at 6.57%. This indicates that MTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.28%
6.57%
MTZ
ACM

Financials

MTZ vs. ACM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MasTec, Inc. and AECOM. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items