CB vs. VOT

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

CB (Chubb Limited) is a stock, while VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, CB returned 12.46%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for VOT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CB vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chubb Limited (CB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 9.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CB having a 12.46% annualized return and VOT not far behind at 12.31%.

CB

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: 13.90%
• YTD: 13.38%
• 6M: 13.38%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: 18.61%
• 10Y*: 12.46%

VOT

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 9.24%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 8.09%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: 5.77%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CB vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CB Chubb Limited	13.38%	14.46%	23.89%	4.20%	15.97%	27.85%	1.41%	22.94%	-9.63%	12.82%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	9.24%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-5.56%	21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CB and VOT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006	0.43

The correlation between CB and VOT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CB vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CB

CB Risk / Return Rank: 79
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 16
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CB vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CB	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	0.48	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	0.78	+1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.09	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	0.51	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.35	1.51	+4.83

CB vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CB Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CB and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CB vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CB	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-60.16%	+9.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-15.96%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.35%	-21.77%	+7.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.26%	-37.19%	+17.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.59%	-37.19%	-5.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.78%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-9.93%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	5.35%	-1.21%

Volatility

CB vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 6.76%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CB	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.76%	7.19%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.71%	13.85%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.22%	16.94%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.31%	21.55%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.66%	21.01%	+2.65%

Dividends

CB vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than VOT's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CB Chubb Limited	1.12%	1.22%	1.30%	1.51%	1.49%	1.65%	2.01%	1.91%	2.24%	1.93%	2.07%	4.23%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CB and VOT in my portfolio?

CB and VOT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CB or VOT?

VOT has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to CB (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.