CB vs. AFG
CB (Chubb Limited) and AFG (American Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, CB returned 12.89%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for AFG. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CB vs. AFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than AFG's 7.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has underperformed AFG with an annualized return of 12.89%, while AFG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.
CB
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.11%
AFG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- YTD
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $52.06M | $62.68M | $65.16M | |
| $775.34M | $719.59M | $600.51M |
CB vs. AFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 13.04% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
AFG American Financial Group, Inc. | 7.00% | 5.45% | 23.79% | -7.61% | 10.91% | 93.83% | -16.18% | 27.10% | -13.04% | 29.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and AFG is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CB and AFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CB:
$135.29B
AFG:
$11.77B
CB:
$35.80
AFG:
$10.54
CB:
9.80
AFG:
13.44
CB:
3.94
AFG:
1.45
CB:
1.70
AFG:
2.52
CB:
$35.28B
AFG:
$8.15B
CB:
$10.23B
AFG:
$2.64B
CB:
$15.23B
AFG:
$1.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. AFG — Risk / Return Rank
CB
AFG
CB vs. AFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CB | AFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 1.48 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 2.77 | +7.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CB vs. AFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum AFG drawdown of -62.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and AFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | AFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -62.94% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -13.19% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -19.85% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -23.85% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | -58.98% | +16.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -2.17% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -16.70% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 7.07% | -3.69% |
Volatility
CB vs. AFG - Volatility Comparison
Chubb Limited (CB) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG) at 4.99%. This indicates that CB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | AFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 4.99% | +3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | 12.80% | +2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 19.01% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 22.73% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.81% | 30.27% | -6.46% |
Dividends
CB vs. AFG - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than AFG's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFG American Financial Group, Inc. | 4.95% | 5.33% | 6.89% | 6.81% | 10.42% | 20.43% | 4.39% | 4.51% | 4.92% | 4.41% | 2.44% | 2.82% |
CB Chubb Limited | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
Financials
CB vs. AFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and American Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CB vs. AFG - Profitability Comparison
CB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported a gross profit of -6.85B and revenue of -10.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
AFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 948.00M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.
CB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported an operating income of 14.07M and revenue of -10.99B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.
AFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 239.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
CB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported a net income of 5.88B and revenue of -10.99B, resulting in a net margin of -53.5%.
AFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and AFG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CB has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to AFG (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs AFG's -62.94%.
CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and AFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer