CB vs. CI
CB (Chubb Limited) and CI (The Cigna Group) are both stocks. CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CB returned 12.89%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for CI. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CB vs. CI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than CI's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has outperformed CI with an annualized return of 12.89%, while CI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.
CB
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.11%
CI
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $775.34M | $719.59M | $600.51M | |
| $460.57M | $474.33M | $477.27M |
CB vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 13.04% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
CI The Cigna Group | 2.54% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and CI is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
CB:
$135.29B
CI:
$73.82B
CB:
$35.80
CI:
$24.16
CB:
9.80
CI:
11.55
CB:
0.68
CI:
0.67
CB:
3.94
CI:
0.26
CB:
1.70
CI:
1.73
CB:
$35.28B
CI:
$282.38B
CB:
$10.23B
CI:
$17.96B
CB:
$15.23B
CI:
$9.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank
CB
CI
CB vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and The Cigna Group (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CB | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.07 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 0.31 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 0.74 | +9.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CB vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and CI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -84.34% | +33.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -21.41% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -32.10% | +17.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -32.10% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | -42.47% | -0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -21.16% | +17.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -18.82% | +8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 9.02% | -5.64% |
Volatility
CB vs. CI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 8.96%, while The Cigna Group (CI) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 10.65% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | 20.43% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 33.83% | -14.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 28.73% | -8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.81% | 30.70% | -6.89% |
Dividends
CB vs. CI - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than CI's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
CI The Cigna Group | 2.20% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Financials
CB vs. CI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and The Cigna Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CB vs. CI - Profitability Comparison
CB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported a gross profit of -6.85B and revenue of -10.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 71.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported an operating income of 14.07M and revenue of -10.99B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 71.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
CB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported a net income of 5.88B and revenue of -10.99B, resulting in a net margin of -53.5%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported a net income of 1.66B and revenue of 71.67B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and CI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CI has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to CB (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs CI's -84.34%.
CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and CI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer