CATH vs. SPYG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - CATH tracks the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index while SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CATH returned 14.82%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CATH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

CATH vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CATH has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 14.82%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.

CATH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 24.47%
• 3Y*: 20.86%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 14.82%

SPYG

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 13.57%
• 1Y: 33.95%
• 3Y*: 28.16%
• 5Y*: 16.07%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATH vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF	9.37%	17.08%	23.34%	26.15%	-19.96%	28.87%	18.80%	30.64%	-5.80%	22.83%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.75%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CATH and SPYG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016	0.91

The correlation between CATH and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

CATH vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CATH	SPYG
Technology	38.1%	51.9%
Financial Services	11.4%	8.5%
Communication Services	10.7%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	8.9%
Healthcare	7.9%	5.8%
Industrials	7.6%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	1.0%
Energy	3.3%	0.1%
Utilities	2.8%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.6%
Basic Materials	1.7%	0.3%

Return for Risk

CATH vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATH

CATH Risk / Return Rank: 58
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 57
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATH vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CATH	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.12	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.90	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	2.48	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.67	10.25	+1.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CATH vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATH Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATH and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CATH	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.12	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.76	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.88	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.35	+0.44

Drawdowns

CATH vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CATH	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.95%	-67.63%	+33.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.42%	-13.76%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.34%	-22.14%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.14%	-32.67%	+4.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.95%	-32.67%	-1.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-1.13%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-24.33%	+19.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	3.32%	-1.22%

Volatility

CATH vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is 2.69%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that CATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CATH	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	4.35%	-1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	12.46%	-3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	16.06%	-3.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.89%	21.17%	-3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.61%	20.64%	-2.03%

CATH vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CATH vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF	0.77%	0.84%	0.95%	1.16%	1.34%	1.03%	1.23%	0.68%	2.01%	1.27%	0.50%	0.00%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CATH and SPYG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CATH and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CATH or SPYG?

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to CATH (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, CATH or SPYG?

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 14.82% for CATH. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CATH or SPYG?

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CATH or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CATH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CATH or SPYG?

CATH has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between CATH and SPYG?

CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CATH and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.