PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARZ vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARZ vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 57.52% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CARZ has outperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 16.49%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.68% annualized return.


CARZ

1D
-0.37%
1M
19.08%
YTD
57.52%
6M
60.74%
1Y
116.25%
3Y*
34.19%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
16.49%

FDIS

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARZ vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
57.52%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.65%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CARZ and FDIS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.69

The correlation between CARZ and FDIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CARZ vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CARZ
FDIS

Technology

60.6%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

19.5%
96.9%

Industrials

8.1%
0.8%

Basic Materials

6.6%

-

Communication Services

5.1%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CARZ
60.6%
FDIS
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CARZ
19.5%
FDIS
96.9%

Industrials

CARZ
8.1%
FDIS
0.8%

Basic Materials

CARZ
6.6%
FDIS

-

Communication Services

CARZ
5.1%
FDIS
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

CARZ

-

FDIS
1.0%

Energy

CARZ

-

FDIS

-

Financial Services

CARZ

-

FDIS
0.1%

Healthcare

CARZ

-

FDIS
0.1%

Real Estate

CARZ

-

FDIS
0.1%

Utilities

CARZ

-

FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARZ vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARZ vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARZFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.10

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.10

0.64

+7.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.71

2.00

+30.71

CARZ vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARZ Sharpe Ratio is 4.53, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARZ and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARZFDISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53

0.54

+4.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.26

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.62

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.61

-0.15

Drawdowns

CARZ vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARZFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.20%

-39.16%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-15.50%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-27.43%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-39.16%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

-39.16%

-12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-5.22%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-7.50%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

4.93%

-1.36%

Volatility

CARZ vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 5.20%. This indicates that CARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARZFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

5.20%

+4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.31%

13.06%

+7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.79%

18.37%

+7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.11%

23.87%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.27%

22.29%

+3.98%

CARZ vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARZ vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.35%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARZ and FDIS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to FDIS (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARZ dropped -51.20% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, CARZ leads with 16.49% vs 13.68% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.08% for FDIS.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARZ and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer