CARZ vs. SMH
CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CARZ returned 16.27%/yr vs 37.85%/yr for SMH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARZ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
CARZ vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 45.91% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CARZ has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 16.27%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.85% annualized return.
CARZ
- 1D
- -6.26%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 45.91%
- 6M
- 45.04%
- 1Y
- 96.22%
- 3Y*
- 30.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.27%
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
CARZ vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 45.91% | 37.18% | 3.26% | 42.47% | -31.25% | 18.09% | 54.66% | 11.39% | -23.91% | 25.47% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARZ and SMH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2011 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, CARZ and SMH have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.66, meaning their price movements have been converging.
CARZ vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CARZ
SMH
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CARZ
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
CARZ
SMH
-
Industrials
CARZ
SMH
-
Basic Materials
CARZ
SMH
-
Communication Services
CARZ
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
CARZ
-
SMH
-
Energy
CARZ
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
CARZ
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
CARZ
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
CARZ
-
SMH
-
Utilities
CARZ
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARZ vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
CARZ
SMH
CARZ vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARZ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.58 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.70 | 9.31 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.83 | 33.88 | -9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARZ vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARZ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.20% | -84.96% | +33.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -14.93% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -35.74% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.30% | -45.30% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | -45.30% | -5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -7.01% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -41.01% | +28.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 4.10% | -0.21% |
Volatility
CARZ vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) is 16.09%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that CARZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARZ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.09% | 19.08% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.90% | 29.18% | -4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.42% | 34.87% | -5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 35.83% | -7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.54% | 32.97% | -6.43% |
CARZ vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARZ vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.46% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARZ and SMH have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to CARZ (16.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARZ dropped -51.20% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.85% vs 16.27% for CARZ. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CARZ has been the lower-risk option at 16.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 16.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.
CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
CARZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARZ and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer