PortfoliosLab logo
CARZ vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CARZ and QQQ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

CARZ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-3.66%
-7.51%
DXJS
DXJ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CARZ:

-0.68

QQQ:

-0.18

Sortino Ratio

CARZ:

-0.79

QQQ:

-0.10

Omega Ratio

CARZ:

0.91

QQQ:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

CARZ:

-0.73

QQQ:

-0.18

Martin Ratio

CARZ:

-2.16

QQQ:

-0.70

Ulcer Index

CARZ:

8.32%

QQQ:

5.41%

Daily Std Dev

CARZ:

26.58%

QQQ:

21.28%

Max Drawdown

CARZ:

-51.20%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

CARZ:

-24.59%

QQQ:

-21.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a -18.30% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -17.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CARZ has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 3.52%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.79% annualized return.


CARZ

YTD

-18.30%

1M

-16.97%

6M

-17.93%

1Y

-17.12%

5Y*

18.48%

10Y*

3.52%

QQQ

YTD

-17.20%

1M

-15.68%

6M

-13.00%

1Y

-2.32%

5Y*

18.97%

10Y*

15.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco QQQ

CARZ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CARZ: current value is 0.70%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CARZ: 0.70%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQ: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CARZ vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CARZ is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CARZ is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CARZ is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CARZ is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CARZ is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CARZ is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CARZ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for DXJS, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
DXJS: -0.08
DXJ: -0.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for DXJS, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
DXJS: 0.03
DXJ: -0.18
The chart of Omega ratio for DXJS, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
DXJS: 1.00
DXJ: 0.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for DXJS, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
DXJS: -0.10
DXJ: -0.30
The chart of Martin ratio for DXJS, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
DXJS: -0.36
DXJ: -0.93

The current CARZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARZ and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.08
-0.26
DXJS
DXJ

Dividends

CARZ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than QQQ's 0.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014

Drawdowns

CARZ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.10%
-14.56%
DXJS
DXJ

Volatility

CARZ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) is NaN%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that CARZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.84%
14.64%
DXJS
DXJ

User Portfolios with CARZ or QQQ


DXJS
FDD
GLDM
GBTC
24
4%
YTD
0700.HK
0883.HK
MSFT
NVDA
LLY
NVO
HESAY
RNMBY
MITSY
DXJ
1 / 16

Recent discussions

Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio

Do the screens just pick the 10 stock portfolio & has the selection been the same for awhile? Seems like a no-brainer way to go based on performance, ease, expense. Just trying to get some clarity on this lazy portfolio.

4803heights

April 05, 25 Posted in general
309

Going forward performance roughly coinciding with historically optimized portfolios on this site?

I'm quite new to the site, but I am concerned that a portfolio optimized with past data may have no bearing at all on its future performance. Has anyone been around long enough to speak to this concern. Have you outperformed a relevant benchmark with actual invested money?

Also, if you've been here awhile, what tools on the site do you find most useful?

Thanks for reading!

Bob Peticolas

December 19, 23 Posted in general
1K

How is Sharpe ratio calculated?

The highest sharpe ratio portfolioi in User portfolios holds only ultrashort treasuries and show a sharpe ratio of 7+. But my understanding is the Sharpe ratio is the return less the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation of returns. But short-term treasuries ARE the risk free rate, so the Sharpe ratio should be zero since the risk free rate minus the risk free rate is zero. So are you simply ignoring the risk-free rate and dividing returns by the standard deviation???

Addendum:

Just input my portfolio and asked that your site optimize it for Sharpe ratio. I have ready cash in USFR, and ETF that holds US floating rate notes exclusively. The optimization recommended I put over 99% in USFR. However, the interest rate on floating rate notes is based on the three month treasury, so again, USFR has a Sharpe ratio of zero! Please correct this!

Bob Peticolas

December 12, 23 Posted in general
945