CAMT vs. FN

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

CAMT (Camtek Ltd) and FN (Fabrinet) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CAMT in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, FN in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, CAMT returned 51.14%/yr vs 29.26%/yr for FN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CAMT vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 38.31% return, which is significantly higher than FN's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed FN with an annualized return of 51.14%, while FN has yielded a comparatively lower 29.26% annualized return.

CAMT

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -24.63%
• 6M: 0.79%
• YTD: 38.31%
• 1Y: 59.00%
• 3Y*: 50.21%
• 5Y*: 33.26%
• 10Y*: 51.14%
• ALL TIME*: 13.14%

FN

• 1D: 3.32%
• 1M: -13.86%
• 6M: -0.04%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 1Y: 58.95%
• 3Y*: 58.71%
• 5Y*: 39.38%
• 10Y*: 29.26%
• ALL TIME*: 26.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMT vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAMT Camtek Ltd	38.31%	31.66%	18.33%	215.94%	-52.30%	110.13%	102.31%	63.19%	20.41%	77.72%
FN Fabrinet	8.56%	107.06%	15.53%	48.44%	8.23%	52.69%	19.66%	26.37%	78.78%	-28.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMT and FN is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010	0.34

The correlation between CAMT and FN shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CAMT : $6.86B FN : $17.71B
EPS CAMT : $0.98 FN : $11.64
PE Ratio CAMT : 150.18 FN : 42.46
PEG Ratio CAMT : 30.61 FN : 1.82
PS Ratio CAMT : 14.46 FN : 4.22
PB Ratio CAMT : 11.09 FN : 7.77
Total Revenue (TTM) CAMT : $499.09M FN : $4.24B
Gross Profit (TTM) CAMT : $250.68M FN : $509.75M
EBITDA (TTM) CAMT : $122.77M FN : $422.55M

Return for Risk

CAMT vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMT

CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 73
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 73
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMT vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAMT	FN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	0.85	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	1.46	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.18	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.54	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	4.59	-0.21

CAMT vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the FN Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMT and FN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAMT vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and FN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAMT	FN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.71%	-70.46%	-27.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.77%	-38.35%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.16%	-38.35%	-24.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.16%	-38.70%	-24.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.16%	-51.11%	-12.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.10%	-33.79%	+4.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.59%	-22.62%	-32.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.52%	12.89%	+0.63%

Volatility

CAMT vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a higher volatility of 26.47% compared to Fabrinet (FN) at 20.24%. This indicates that CAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAMT	FN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.47%	20.24%	+6.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.96%	56.58%	-2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.70%	69.61%	-1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.88%	54.51%	+2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.55%	48.71%	+3.84%

Dividends

CAMT vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAMT nor FN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAMT Camtek Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.57%	2.07%	2.45%
FN Fabrinet	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

CAMT vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Camtek Ltd and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Portfolio components

CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAMT and FN in my portfolio?

CAMT and FN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAMT or FN?

CAMT has higher volatility (26.47%) compared to FN (20.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMT dropped -97.71% vs FN's -70.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.