CAG vs. KMB
CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — CAG in Packaged Foods, KMB in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, CAG returned -5.11%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for KMB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAG vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 9.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -5.11%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.33% annualized return.
CAG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- -13.95%
- 3Y*
- -18.83%
- 5Y*
- -10.91%
- 10Y*
- -5.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.76%
KMB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- -10.55%
- 3Y*
- -3.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.88%
CAG vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -10.31% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 9.91% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and KMB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.35 |
The correlation between CAG and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAG:
$7.11B
KMB:
$35.87B
CAG:
-$4.00
KMB:
$5.93
CAG:
0.63
KMB:
2.18
CAG:
1.12
KMB:
20.05
CAG:
$11.28B
KMB:
$16.54B
CAG:
$2.70B
KMB:
$5.93B
CAG:
-$1.63B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAG vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
CAG
KMB
CAG vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | -0.36 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | -0.53 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAG vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -36.97% | -25.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.58% | -29.60% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.66% | -34.06% | -22.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.52% | -34.06% | -28.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.52% | -34.06% | -28.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.76% | -22.38% | -33.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -8.88% | -6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.74% | 20.13% | -2.39% |
Volatility
CAG vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.94%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 8.94% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.14% | 18.50% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.94% | 26.96% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 20.56% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 21.22% | +5.29% |
Dividends
CAG vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than KMB's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 9.43% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.70% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
CAG vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAG vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.70M and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.63B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of -91.2%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -1.62B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of -56.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAG and KMB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to KMB (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs KMB's -36.97%.
KMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAG and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer