CAG vs. HAL
CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. CAG operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CAG returned -5.70%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for HAL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAG vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -5.70%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher 0.88% annualized return.
CAG
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -17.02%
- 6M
- -19.07%
- 1Y
- -32.99%
- 3Y*
- -21.83%
- 5Y*
- -13.84%
- 10Y*
- -5.70%
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
CAG vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -17.02% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and HAL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
CAG:
$6.58B
HAL:
$33.22B
CAG:
-$0.09
HAL:
$1.82
CAG:
0.59
HAL:
1.51
CAG:
0.81
HAL:
3.07
CAG:
$11.18B
HAL:
$22.17B
CAG:
$2.70B
HAL:
$3.40B
CAG:
$792.70M
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAG vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
CAG
HAL
CAG vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAG | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.36 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 6.47 | -7.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 16.47 | -18.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAG vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAG | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -92.99% | +30.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.75% | -13.10% | -23.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.85% | -54.01% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.52% | -54.01% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.52% | -91.45% | +28.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.06% | -32.89% | -26.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -39.12% | +23.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.37% | 5.14% | +15.23% |
Volatility
CAG vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) is 8.53%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that CAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAG | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 9.32% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 24.13% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.21% | 36.76% | -8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 40.18% | -16.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 45.96% | -19.76% |
Dividends
CAG vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.19%, more than HAL's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 10.19% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
CAG vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAG vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.70M and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 280.10M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 199.80M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAG and HAL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to CAG (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAG and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer