CAFG vs. GSSC

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - CAFG tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GSSC tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAFG returned 14.98%/yr vs 17.23%/yr for GSSC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GSSC.

Performance

CAFG vs. GSSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 31.64% return, which is significantly higher than GSSC's 20.15% return.

CAFG

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 3.38%
• 6M: 24.65%
• YTD: 31.64%
• 1Y: 37.35%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSSC

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.74%
• 6M: 14.84%
• YTD: 20.15%
• 1Y: 31.53%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 8.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAFG vs. GSSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	31.64%	0.17%	6.95%	21.26%
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF	20.15%	10.76%	11.14%	18.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CAFG and GSSC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2023	0.90

The correlation between CAFG and GSSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAFG vs. GSSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CAFG	GSSC
Technology	34.1%	18.2%
Healthcare	18.7%	16.6%
Industrials	18.3%	17.6%
Energy	12.2%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	10.1%
Communication Services	3.5%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.8%
Basic Materials	2.1%	3.9%
Utilities	1.4%	2.1%
Financial Services	-	16.6%
Real Estate	-	4.3%

Return for Risk

CAFG vs. GSSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAFG

CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 82
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 87

GSSC

GSSC Risk / Return Rank: 61
GSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAFG vs. GSSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAFG	GSSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.57	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.28	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.27	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.38	2.79	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.65	9.35	+5.30

CAFG vs. GSSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the GSSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFG and GSSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAFG vs. GSSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum GSSC drawdown of -41.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and GSSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAFG	GSSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.66%	-41.38%	+17.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-10.56%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-26.05%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-0.94%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-8.93%	+3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	3.16%	-0.71%

Volatility

CAFG vs. GSSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is 4.05%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that CAFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAFG	GSSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	4.48%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	13.30%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.63%	18.73%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.46%	21.26%	-1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.46%	22.96%	-3.50%

CAFG vs. GSSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GSSC's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAFG vs. GSSC - Dividend Comparison

CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than GSSC's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.30%	0.35%	0.36%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF	1.04%	1.17%	1.42%	1.33%	1.31%	1.00%	0.94%	1.24%	1.21%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAFG and GSSC in my portfolio?

CAFG and GSSC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAFG or GSSC?

GSSC has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to CAFG (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAFG dropped -23.66% vs GSSC's -41.38%.

Which ETF is better, CAFG or GSSC?

On 3-year performance, GSSC leads with 17.23% vs 14.98% for CAFG. On fees, GSSC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CAFG has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAFG or GSSC?

Over the 3-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 14.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAFG or GSSC?

GSSC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAFG or GSSC?

GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.30% for CAFG.

What is the main difference between CAFG and GSSC?

CAFG tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAFG and 0.20% for GSSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.