PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CABZ vs. GXPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CABZ vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CABZ

1D
-4.11%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXPT

1D
-3.44%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
16.86%
6M
15.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and GXPT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CABZ vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CABZ vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and GXPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CABZGXPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.13%

-18.74%

-4.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.39%

-8.72%

-6.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-5.04%

-4.27%

Volatility

CABZ vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CABZGXPTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.36%

22.91%

+11.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.36%

22.91%

+11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.36%

22.91%

+11.45%

CABZ vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

CABZ vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CABZ and GXPT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CABZ.

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.15% for GXPT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CABZ and GXPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer