CABZ vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

CABZ vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CABZ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -15.95%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 65.84%
• 6M: 64.65%
• 1Y: 110.84%
• 3Y*: 53.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	-13.70%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	58.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and CHAT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.82

CABZ vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CABZ	CHAT
Technology	46.6%	77.8%
Consumer Cyclical	36.2%	2.4%
Communication Services	11.1%	16.1%
Industrials	4.9%	3.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CABZ vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CABZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABZ vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CABZ	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.85	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.87	—

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABZ	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.13%	-31.34%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.74%	-6.04%	-11.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.45%	-5.39%	-4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CABZ	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.19%	34.79%	-0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.19%	31.21%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.19%	31.21%	+2.98%

CABZ vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABZ vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.

Position	TTM	2025
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.72%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CABZ and CHAT in my portfolio?

CABZ and CHAT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CABZ or CHAT?

On fees, CABZ is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CABZ or CHAT?

CABZ is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CABZ or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.

What is the main difference between CABZ and CHAT?

Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.75% for CHAT.