CABZ vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

CABZ vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CABZ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -15.95%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	-16.22%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and ARMH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.62

Return for Risk

CABZ vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABZ	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.13%	-24.85%	+1.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.74%	-20.68%	+2.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.45%	-8.89%	-0.56%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CABZ	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.19%	117.02%	-82.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.19%	117.02%	-82.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.19%	117.02%	-82.83%

CABZ vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABZ vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither CABZ nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CABZ and ARMH in my portfolio?

CABZ and ARMH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CABZ or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CABZ or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CABZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CABZ or ARMH?

CABZ and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CABZ and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.19% for ARMH.