CABZ vs. ARMH
CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
CABZ vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CABZ
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- -5.46%
- 1M
- -33.82%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CABZ vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF | -14.21% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -16.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CABZ and ARMH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CABZ vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CABZ vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CABZ | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.13% | -41.19% | +18.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -41.19% | +25.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -17.23% | +7.35% |
Volatility
CABZ vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CABZ | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.34% | 103.28% | -67.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.34% | 103.28% | -67.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.34% | 103.28% | -67.94% |
CABZ vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CABZ vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither CABZ nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CABZ and ARMH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CABZ.
CABZ and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for CABZ and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer