BYDDF vs. ASEA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BYDDF (BYD Company Limited) is a stock, while ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. Over the past 10 years, BYDDF returned 20.28%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for ASEA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BYDDF vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYDDF achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 9.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BYDDF has outperformed ASEA with an annualized return of 20.28%, while ASEA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.

BYDDF

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -10.00%
• YTD: -4.06%
• 6M: -6.77%
• 1Y: -30.80%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: 20.28%

ASEA

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 6M: 12.53%
• 1Y: 25.11%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYDDF vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BYDDF BYD Company Limited	-4.06%	11.38%	24.71%	13.22%	-27.71%	28.77%	432.27%	-21.10%	-27.99%	72.50%
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	9.22%	19.80%	9.82%	4.88%	5.24%	4.66%	-7.88%	8.34%	-7.58%	35.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BYDDF and ASEA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2011	0.31

Return for Risk

BYDDF vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDDF

BYDDF Risk / Return Rank: 10
BYDDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BYDDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BYDDF Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BYDDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BYDDF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ASEA

ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 55
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDDF vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BYDDF	ASEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	1.81	-2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.19	2.66	-3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.32	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	3.05	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	8.40	-9.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BYDDF vs. ASEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDF Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the ASEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDDF and ASEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BYDDF	ASEA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.85	1.81	-2.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.66	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.42	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.27	-0.09

Drawdowns

BYDDF vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDF drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than ASEA's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDF and ASEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BYDDF	ASEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.78%	-44.16%	-42.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.12%	-8.28%	-27.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.23%	-22.20%	-19.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.35%	-22.20%	-26.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.45%	-44.16%	-14.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.94%	-3.05%	-35.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.97%	-10.66%	-30.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.47%	3.00%	+21.47%

Volatility

BYDDF vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison

BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 3.39%. This indicates that BYDDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BYDDF	ASEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.94%	3.39%	+5.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.63%	11.20%	+15.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.37%	13.98%	+22.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.70%	14.66%	+31.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.11%	17.59%	+29.52%

Dividends

BYDDF vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison

BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than ASEA's 3.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	3.62%	3.95%	3.61%	3.76%	2.23%	4.19%	2.27%	2.51%	3.08%	1.59%	2.78%	3.64%
BYDDF BYD Company Limited	6.29%	6.04%	1.28%	0.58%	0.07%	0.07%	0.03%	0.58%	0.00%	2.03%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BYDDF and ASEA in my portfolio?

BYDDF and ASEA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BYDDF or ASEA?

BYDDF has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to ASEA (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDDF dropped -86.78% vs ASEA's -44.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.