PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYDDF vs. TM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYDDF vs. TM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYDDF achieves a -14.89% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BYDDF has outperformed TM with an annualized return of 19.39%, while TM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


BYDDF

1D
-1.05%
1M
-13.51%
YTD
-14.89%
6M
-14.17%
1Y
-35.85%
3Y*
-1.56%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
19.39%

TM

1D
0.68%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-18.74%
6M
-19.50%
1Y
0.53%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYDDF vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
-14.89%11.38%24.71%13.22%-27.71%28.77%432.27%-21.10%-27.99%72.50%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
-18.74%13.82%8.88%38.23%-24.43%23.21%13.62%22.69%-5.81%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BYDDF and TM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2007

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYDDF:

$94.18B

TM:

$226.70B

EPS

BYDDF:

CN¥3.05

TM:

¥2.98K

PE Ratio

BYDDF:

22.90

TM:

9.37

PEG Ratio

BYDDF:

0.17

TM:

0.49

PS Ratio

BYDDF:

0.80

TM:

0.71

PB Ratio

BYDDF:

2.55

TM:

0.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥783.83B

TM:

¥51.16T

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥132.11B

TM:

¥8.54T

EBITDA (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥68.89B

TM:

¥7.11T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYDDF vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDDF
BYDDF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BYDDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYDDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYDDF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BYDDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYDDF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TM
TM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDDF vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYDDFTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.03

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

0.02

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

0.04

-1.54

BYDDF vs. TM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDF Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the TM Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDDF and TM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYDDF vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDF drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDF and TM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYDDFTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.78%

-60.15%

-26.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.83%

-30.71%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.83%

-34.92%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.35%

-36.80%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.45%

-36.80%

-21.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.83%

-29.94%

-15.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-22.17%

-18.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.03%

11.91%

+12.12%

Volatility

BYDDF vs. TM - Volatility Comparison

BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) at 7.54%. This indicates that BYDDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYDDFTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

7.54%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.89%

20.39%

+6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.59%

29.41%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.34%

26.93%

+18.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.09%

23.67%

+23.42%

Dividends

BYDDF vs. TM - Dividend Comparison

BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than TM's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
0.51%6.04%1.28%0.58%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.58%0.00%2.03%0.00%0.00%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
1.65%2.95%2.81%2.45%2.90%2.45%2.74%1.30%3.40%2.96%3.23%5.59%

Financials

BYDDF vs. TM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BYD Company Limited and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T12.00T14.00T20222023202420252026
150.23B
12.83T
(BYDDF) Total Revenue
(TM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BYDDF values in CNY, TM values in JPY

BYDDF vs. TM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BYD Company Limited and Toyota Motor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%20222023202420252026
18.8%
15.1%
Portfolio components
BYDDF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.

TM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

BYDDF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

TM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

BYDDF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

TM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYDDF and TM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYDDF has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to TM (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDDF dropped -86.78% vs TM's -60.15%.

TM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYDDF and TM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer