BYDDF vs. BYDDY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY).

Performance

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BYDDF BYD Company Limited	9.96%	11.38%	24.71%	13.22%	-27.71%	28.77%	432.27%	-21.10%	-27.99%	72.50%
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR	9.99%	7.97%	24.81%	13.06%	-27.17%	28.02%	432.95%	-21.04%	-27.71%	69.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BYDDF : $121.04B BYDDY : $121.43B
EPS BYDDF : $4.99 BYDDY : $3.60
PE Ratio BYDDF : 2.69 BYDDY : 3.70
PEG Ratio BYDDF : 0.02 BYDDY : 0.03
PS Ratio BYDDF : 0.11 BYDDY : 0.15
PB Ratio BYDDF : 0.53 BYDDY : 0.53
Total Revenue (TTM) BYDDF : $773.53B BYDDY : $799.66B
Gross Profit (TTM) BYDDF : $116.36B BYDDY : $138.56B
EBITDA (TTM) BYDDF : $100.35B BYDDY : $39.74B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BYDDF having a 9.96% return and BYDDY slightly higher at 9.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BYDDF having a 22.88% annualized return and BYDDY not far behind at 22.47%.

BYDDF

• 1D: -2.07%
• 1M: 6.73%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: -5.43%
• 1Y: -15.01%
• 3Y*: 13.06%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: 22.88%

BYDDY

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: -5.87%
• 1Y: -18.23%
• 3Y*: 11.85%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 22.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BYDDF vs. BYDDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDDF

BYDDF Risk / Return Rank: 25
BYDDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BYDDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BYDDF Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BYDDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BYDDF Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BYDDY

BYDDY Risk / Return Rank: 24
BYDDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BYDDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BYDDY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BYDDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BYDDY Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BYDDF	BYDDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	-0.43	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	-0.36	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.96	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	-0.48	+0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	-0.72	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDF Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is comparable to the BYDDY Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDDF and BYDDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BYDDF	BYDDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36	-0.43	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.28	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.18	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BYDDF and BYDDY is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison

BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than BYDDY's 1.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BYDDF BYD Company Limited	5.49%	6.04%	1.28%	0.58%	0.07%	0.07%	0.03%	0.58%	0.00%	2.03%	0.00%
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR	1.32%	1.45%	1.26%	0.60%	0.07%	0.07%	0.03%	0.47%	0.28%	0.52%	1.92%

Drawdowns

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDF drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, smaller than the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -97.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDF and BYDDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BYDDF	BYDDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.78%	-97.38%	+10.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.23%	-42.29%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.35%	-48.16%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.45%	-58.18%	-0.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.01%	-31.80%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.05%	-64.07%	+23.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.04%	28.38%	-1.34%

Volatility

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) is 14.20%, while BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) has a volatility of 16.03%. This indicates that BYDDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BYDDF	BYDDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.20%	16.03%	-1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.83%	27.76%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.85%	42.95%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.97%	46.20%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.07%	47.20%	-0.13%

Financials

BYDDF vs. BYDDY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BYD Company Limited and BYD Company Limited ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BYDDF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a gross profit of 15.18B and revenue of 207.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.

BYDDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 37.53B and revenue of 234.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.

BYDDF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited reported an operating income of -2.54B and revenue of 207.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

BYDDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported an operating income of 9.51B and revenue of 234.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

BYDDF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a net income of 8.45B and revenue of 207.40B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

BYDDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a net income of 9.16B and revenue of 234.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.