PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYDDF vs. XIACY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYDDF achieves a -14.89% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -37.55% return.


BYDDF

1D
-1.05%
1M
-13.51%
YTD
-14.89%
6M
-14.17%
1Y
-35.85%
3Y*
-1.56%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
19.39%

XIACY

1D
-1.19%
1M
-19.70%
YTD
-37.55%
6M
-39.29%
1Y
-53.60%
3Y*
30.92%
5Y*
-2.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
-14.89%11.38%24.71%13.22%-27.71%27.10%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
-37.55%15.23%118.16%45.75%-42.42%-35.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BYDDF and XIACY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.51

The correlation between BYDDF and XIACY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYDDF:

$94.18B

XIACY:

$83.22B

EPS

BYDDF:

CN¥3.05

XIACY:

CN¥6.64

PE Ratio

BYDDF:

22.90

XIACY:

16.01

PEG Ratio

BYDDF:

0.17

XIACY:

0.11

PS Ratio

BYDDF:

0.80

XIACY:

1.28

PB Ratio

BYDDF:

2.55

XIACY:

2.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥783.83B

XIACY:

CN¥442.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥132.11B

XIACY:

CN¥97.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥68.89B

XIACY:

CN¥40.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYDDF vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDDF
BYDDF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BYDDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYDDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYDDF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BYDDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYDDF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XIACY
XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYDDFXIACYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.75

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.89

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

-1.50

0.00

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDF Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is comparable to the XIACY Sharpe Ratio of -1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDDF and XIACY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDF drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than XIACY's maximum drawdown of -71.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDF and XIACY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYDDFXIACYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.78%

-71.03%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.83%

-60.16%

+20.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.83%

-60.16%

+14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.35%

-70.71%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.83%

-60.16%

+14.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-39.37%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.03%

35.86%

-11.83%

Volatility

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) is 8.37%, while Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that BYDDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYDDFXIACYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

10.12%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.89%

27.01%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.59%

38.85%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.34%

46.46%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.09%

46.45%

+0.64%

Dividends

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison

BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
0.51%6.04%1.28%0.58%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.58%0.00%2.03%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BYD Company Limited and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
150.23B
98.54B
(BYDDF) Total Revenue
(XIACY) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

BYDDF vs. XIACY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BYD Company Limited and Xiaomi Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%20222023202420252026
18.8%
22.0%
Portfolio components
BYDDF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.

XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

BYDDF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

BYDDF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYDDF and XIACY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XIACY has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to BYDDF (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDDF dropped -86.78% vs XIACY's -71.03%.

BYDDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.01 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYDDF and XIACY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer