PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWZ vs. KBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWZ vs. KBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BWZ

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
1.00%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
-0.44%

KBND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWZ vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
-0.10%10.47%-5.31%2.97%-10.56%-6.85%6.47%0.99%-3.36%10.18%
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.89%3.13%-6.81%4.41%9.38%1.25%-0.09%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BWZ and KBND is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2014

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWZ vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWZ
BWZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

KBND
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWZ vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWZKBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.31

BWZ vs. KBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWZKBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

Drawdowns

BWZ vs. KBND - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWZKBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

Volatility

BWZ vs. KBND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWZKBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.95%

BWZ vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BWZ vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison

BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
2.08%2.05%2.47%1.63%0.44%0.60%0.13%0.43%1.10%0.40%0.13%0.06%
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.40%2.20%2.51%6.97%2.27%3.47%4.98%0.00%0.04%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWZ and KBND have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BWZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BWZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KBND.

BWZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

BWZ tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BWZ and 0.50% for KBND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWZ and KBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer