BWZ vs. KBND
BWZ (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF) and KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) are both International Government Bonds funds - BWZ tracks the Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized while KBND tracks the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BWZ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KBND.
Performance
BWZ vs. KBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BWZ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- -0.44%
KBND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWZ vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | -0.10% | 10.47% | -5.31% | 2.97% | -10.56% | -6.85% | 6.47% | 0.99% | -3.36% | 10.18% |
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 3.13% | -6.81% | 4.41% | 9.38% | 1.25% | -0.09% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWZ and KBND is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2014 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWZ vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank
BWZ
KBND
BWZ vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWZ | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWZ | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BWZ vs. KBND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWZ | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.99% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility
BWZ vs. KBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWZ | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.60% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.95% | — | — |
BWZ vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWZ vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison
BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | 2.08% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 1.63% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 0.13% | 0.43% | 1.10% | 0.40% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 2.20% | 2.51% | 6.97% | 2.27% | 3.47% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWZ and KBND have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BWZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BWZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KBND.
BWZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.
BWZ tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BWZ and 0.50% for KBND.
Find the right allocation for BWZ and KBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer