PortfoliosLab logo
BWZ vs. ISHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BWZ and ISHG is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

BWZ vs. ISHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.03%
-12.59%
BWZ
ISHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BWZ:

1.09

ISHG:

1.30

Sortino Ratio

BWZ:

1.75

ISHG:

2.16

Omega Ratio

BWZ:

1.20

ISHG:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

BWZ:

0.28

ISHG:

0.30

Martin Ratio

BWZ:

2.12

ISHG:

2.70

Ulcer Index

BWZ:

4.01%

ISHG:

3.59%

Daily Std Dev

BWZ:

7.80%

ISHG:

7.48%

Max Drawdown

BWZ:

-34.23%

ISHG:

-37.24%

Current Drawdown

BWZ:

-23.02%

ISHG:

-24.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than ISHG's 9.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has underperformed ISHG with an annualized return of -0.49%, while ISHG has yielded a comparatively higher -0.21% annualized return.


BWZ

YTD

8.89%

1M

4.80%

6M

5.49%

1Y

9.03%

5Y*

-0.37%

10Y*

-0.49%

ISHG

YTD

9.80%

1M

5.18%

6M

6.12%

1Y

10.08%

5Y*

0.04%

10Y*

-0.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BWZ vs. ISHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BWZ and ISHG have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Expense ratio chart for BWZ: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BWZ: 0.35%
Expense ratio chart for ISHG: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ISHG: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWZ vs. ISHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BWZ is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BWZ is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BWZ is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BWZ is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BWZ is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BWZ is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ISHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ISHG is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ISHG is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ISHG is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ISHG is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ISHG is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ISHG is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BWZ vs. ISHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BWZ: 1.09
ISHG: 1.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BWZ: 1.75
ISHG: 2.16
The chart of Omega ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
BWZ: 1.20
ISHG: 1.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
BWZ: 0.28
ISHG: 0.30
The chart of Martin ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
BWZ: 2.12
ISHG: 2.70

The current BWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the ISHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWZ and ISHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.09
1.30
BWZ
ISHG

Dividends

BWZ vs. ISHG - Dividend Comparison

BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than ISHG's 2.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
2.29%2.47%1.63%0.44%0.60%0.13%0.43%1.10%0.40%0.13%0.06%0.19%
ISHG
iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF
2.33%2.56%0.18%0.00%1.29%0.00%0.00%1.80%0.46%0.00%0.09%0.42%

Drawdowns

BWZ vs. ISHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, smaller than the maximum ISHG drawdown of -37.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and ISHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-32.00%-30.00%-28.00%-26.00%-24.00%-22.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-23.02%
-24.64%
BWZ
ISHG

Volatility

BWZ vs. ISHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is 3.38%, while iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that BWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3.38%
3.84%
BWZ
ISHG