BWZ vs. FEMB
BWZ (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF) and FEMB (First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BWZ is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while FEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. BWZ is passively managed, while FEMB is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BWZ returned -0.57%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for FEMB. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BWZ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FEMB.
Performance
BWZ vs. FEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than FEMB's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has underperformed FEMB with an annualized return of -0.57%, while FEMB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.90% annualized return.
BWZ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- -1.14%
- 3Y*
- 2.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.80%
- 10Y*
- -0.57%
FEMB
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
BWZ vs. FEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | -1.65% | 10.47% | -5.31% | 2.97% | -10.56% | -6.85% | 6.47% | 0.99% | -3.36% | 10.18% |
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.12% | 21.77% | -5.61% | 17.12% | -10.50% | -13.40% | 3.16% | 11.52% | -7.19% | 11.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWZ and FEMB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014 | 0.44 |
The correlation between BWZ and FEMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWZ vs. FEMB — Risk / Return Rank
BWZ
FEMB
BWZ vs. FEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWZ | FEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.30 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 3.97 | -4.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWZ vs. FEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, which is greater than FEMB's maximum drawdown of -30.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and FEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWZ | FEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.23% | -30.44% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.15% | -7.58% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.60% | -10.13% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.15% | -25.93% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.90% | -30.44% | +5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.20% | -3.41% | -19.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.12% | -9.90% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 2.48% | -0.08% |
Volatility
BWZ vs. FEMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is 1.77%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that BWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWZ | FEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 2.80% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.11% | 6.87% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.87% | 8.61% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 10.27% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 10.86% | -3.90% |
BWZ vs. FEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWZ vs. FEMB - Dividend Comparison
BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than FEMB's 6.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | 2.12% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 1.63% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 0.13% | 0.43% | 1.10% | 0.40% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.03% | 5.67% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWZ and FEMB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEMB has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to BWZ (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWZ dropped -34.23% vs FEMB's -30.44%.
On 10-year performance, FEMB leads with 1.90% vs -0.57% for BWZ. On fees, BWZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BWZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEMB has performed better with a 1.90% return vs -0.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BWZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FEMB.
FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.03%, compared with 2.12% for BWZ.
BWZ is categorized as International Government Bonds, while FEMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BWZ and 0.85% for FEMB.
FEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWZ and FEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer