BWZ vs. FEMB
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB).
BWZ and FEMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BWZ is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized. It was launched on Jan 15, 2009. FEMB is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 4, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BWZ or FEMB.
Correlation
The correlation between BWZ and FEMB is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BWZ vs. FEMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BWZ:
1.09
FEMB:
0.70
BWZ:
1.75
FEMB:
1.09
BWZ:
1.20
FEMB:
1.13
BWZ:
0.28
FEMB:
0.44
BWZ:
2.12
FEMB:
1.40
BWZ:
4.01%
FEMB:
4.88%
BWZ:
7.80%
FEMB:
9.83%
BWZ:
-34.23%
FEMB:
-30.44%
BWZ:
-23.02%
FEMB:
-8.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than FEMB's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has underperformed FEMB with an annualized return of -0.43%, while FEMB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.53% annualized return.
BWZ
8.89%
4.61%
5.49%
8.59%
-0.31%
-0.43%
FEMB
8.36%
2.97%
3.38%
7.88%
2.91%
0.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BWZ vs. FEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BWZ vs. FEMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BWZ
FEMB
BWZ vs. FEMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BWZ vs. FEMB - Dividend Comparison
BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FEMB's 5.84% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | 2.29% | 2.47% | 1.63% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 0.13% | 0.43% | 1.10% | 0.40% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.19% |
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 5.84% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
BWZ vs. FEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, which is greater than FEMB's maximum drawdown of -30.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and FEMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BWZ vs. FEMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is 3.38%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that BWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.