BUYZ vs. USL
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. BUYZ is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -6.77%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for USL. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
BUYZ vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- -13.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- -6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
BUYZ vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -14.51% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 111.45% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | -5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and USL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.09 |
The correlation between BUYZ and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUYZ vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYZ
USL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYZ
USL
-
Communication Services
BUYZ
USL
-
Technology
BUYZ
USL
-
Financial Services
BUYZ
USL
Consumer Defensive
BUYZ
USL
-
Industrials
BUYZ
USL
-
Real Estate
BUYZ
USL
-
Healthcare
BUYZ
USL
-
Basic Materials
BUYZ
-
USL
-
Energy
BUYZ
-
USL
-
Utilities
BUYZ
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
USL
BUYZ vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYZ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.33 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.39 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 6.85 | -7.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYZ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 1.99 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.57 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.01 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -89.06% | +21.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -16.76% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | -23.33% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | -33.82% | -29.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.82% | -39.10% | -5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -61.45% | +22.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.20% | 8.27% | +6.93% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) is 5.10%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that BUYZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 10.57% | -5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | 23.34% | -6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 28.59% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 30.09% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 32.34% | -2.43% |
BUYZ vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUYZ nor USL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and USL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to BUYZ (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.05% vs -6.77% for BUYZ. On fees, BUYZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BUYZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.05% return vs -6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUYZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
BUYZ and USL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer