BUYZ vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -6.77%/yr vs -2.38%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -2.83% return.

BUYZ

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -14.51%
• 6M: -15.65%
• 1Y: -13.45%
• 3Y*: 11.23%
• 5Y*: -6.77%
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: -2.83%
• 6M: -4.10%
• 1Y: -5.09%
• 3Y*: -1.85%
• 5Y*: -2.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	-14.51%	8.70%	28.25%	39.13%	-49.81%	-19.38%	111.45%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-2.83%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYZ and CCOR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020	0.03

The correlation between BUYZ and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (3 years) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUYZ	CCOR
Consumer Cyclical	41.0%	9.4%
Communication Services	21.9%	8.7%
Technology	15.9%	16.2%
Financial Services	7.8%	17.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	6.8%
Industrials	4.7%	9.2%
Real Estate	2.5%	2.8%
Healthcare	0.7%	10.8%
Basic Materials	-	5.1%
Energy	-	7.2%
Utilities	-	6.3%

Return for Risk

BUYZ vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYZ

BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 3
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUYZ	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	-0.73	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	-0.97	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.89	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	-0.58	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	-1.34	+0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is comparable to the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYZ and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUYZ	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.61	-0.73	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	-0.22	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.12	+0.07

Drawdowns

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUYZ	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.04%	-22.99%	-45.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.85%	-8.75%	-22.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.85%	-12.31%	-18.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.32%	-22.99%	-40.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.82%	-19.29%	-25.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.76%	-7.29%	-31.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.20%	3.80%	+11.40%

Volatility

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.05%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUYZ	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	2.05%	+3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.15%	5.05%	+12.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.22%	6.99%	+15.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.17%	11.10%	+16.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.91%	10.75%	+19.16%

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUYZ vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.10%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUYZ and CCOR in my portfolio?

BUYZ and CCOR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUYZ or CCOR?

BUYZ has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to CCOR (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, BUYZ or CCOR?

On 5-year performance, CCOR leads with -2.38% vs -6.77% for BUYZ. On fees, BUYZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUYZ or CCOR?

Over the 5-year period, CCOR has performed better with a -2.38% return vs -6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUYZ or CCOR?

BUYZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUYZ or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.

What is the main difference between BUYZ and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.