BULD vs. ICOW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BULD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 20.25%/yr vs 16.87%/yr for ICOW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.

Performance

BULD vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 36.22% return, which is significantly higher than ICOW's 8.64% return.

BULD

• 1D: -4.35%
• 1M: 7.78%
• YTD: 36.22%
• 6M: 33.89%
• 1Y: 64.21%
• 3Y*: 20.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICOW

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: -6.45%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 27.98%
• 3Y*: 16.87%
• 5Y*: 8.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULD vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	36.22%	23.20%	-3.93%	28.27%	-12.41%
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF	8.64%	36.95%	-2.59%	18.94%	-6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BULD and ICOW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022	0.61

The correlation between BULD and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BULD vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULD

BULD Risk / Return Rank: 73
BULD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BULD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BULD Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BULD Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BULD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ICOW

ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 63
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULD vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BULD	ICOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.91	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	2.52	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.34	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	3.51	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.10	11.46	+1.64

BULD vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULD Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULD and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BULD vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and ICOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BULD	ICOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.64%	-43.49%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.48%	-8.02%	-7.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.64%	-14.81%	-12.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	-8.01%	+3.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-7.56%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.92%	2.45%	+2.47%

Volatility

BULD vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 5.85%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BULD	ICOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.04%	5.85%	+6.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.55%	11.90%	+11.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.58%	14.75%	+14.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.06%	16.77%	+11.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.06%	18.51%	+9.55%

BULD vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BULD vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than ICOW's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	0.84%	1.24%	0.18%	0.21%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.35%	3.03%	4.39%	3.61%	5.26%	2.11%	2.46%	3.10%	2.61%	0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BULD and ICOW in my portfolio?

BULD and ICOW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BULD or ICOW?

BULD has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to ICOW (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

Which ETF is better, BULD or ICOW?

On 3-year performance, BULD leads with 20.25% vs 16.87% for ICOW. On fees, BULD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BULD or ICOW?

Over the 3-year period, BULD has performed better with a 20.25% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BULD or ICOW?

BULD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BULD or ICOW?

ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.84% for BULD.

What is the main difference between BULD and ICOW?

BULD is categorized as Technology Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.65% for ICOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.