PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BULD vs. AIVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BULD vs. AIVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 39.81% return, which is significantly higher than AIVI's 19.47% return.


BULD

1D
4.90%
1M
2.80%
6M
26.57%
YTD
39.81%
1Y
60.54%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.71%

AIVI

1D
1.11%
1M
6.07%
6M
11.88%
YTD
19.47%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
9.42%
ALL TIME*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$329.14K$180.30K$118.76K
$113.24K$396.65K$316.21K

BULD vs. AIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
39.81%23.20%-3.93%28.27%-12.41%
AIVI
WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund
19.47%38.68%2.07%18.11%-4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BULD and AIVI is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.60

The correlation between BULD and AIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BULD vs. AIVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BULD
BULD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BULD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BULD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BULD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BULD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BULD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVI
AIVI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BULD vs. AIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BULDAIVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.91

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

10.23

+0.21

BULD vs. AIVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULD Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the AIVI Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULD and AIVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BULD vs. AIVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum AIVI drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and AIVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BULDAIVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.64%

-65.98%

+38.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.04%

-10.92%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.64%

-11.71%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

0.00%

-5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-15.41%

+7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.82%

3.10%

+2.72%

Volatility

BULD vs. AIVI - Volatility Comparison

Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) at 3.74%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BULDAIVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

3.74%

+6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.38%

11.58%

+13.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.07%

13.47%

+18.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.45%

15.19%

+13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.45%

16.09%

+12.36%

BULD vs. AIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BULD vs. AIVI - Dividend Comparison

BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than AIVI's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVI
WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund
4.87%4.70%4.94%5.05%4.32%5.53%3.50%4.31%4.21%3.65%3.98%4.23%
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
0.82%1.24%0.18%0.21%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BULD and AIVI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BULD has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to AIVI (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs AIVI's -65.98%.

On 3-year performance, BULD leads with 21.26% vs 21.14% for AIVI. On fees, AIVI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, AIVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BULD has performed better with a 21.26% return vs 21.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BULD.

AIVI has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 0.82% for BULD.

BULD is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.58% for AIVI.

AIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BULD and AIVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer