BULD vs. IBOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT).
BULD and IBOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULD is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index. It was launched on May 4, 2022. IBOT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BlueStar® Robotics Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2023. Both BULD and IBOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BULD or IBOT.
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and IBOT is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BULD vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BULD:
0.30
IBOT:
0.54
BULD:
0.59
IBOT:
0.87
BULD:
1.07
IBOT:
1.11
BULD:
0.37
IBOT:
0.74
BULD:
0.73
IBOT:
1.76
BULD:
9.85%
IBOT:
6.38%
BULD:
23.54%
IBOT:
20.68%
BULD:
-26.50%
IBOT:
-19.16%
BULD:
-1.14%
IBOT:
-4.51%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than IBOT's 6.29% return.
BULD
12.60%
10.91%
12.89%
2.11%
N/A
N/A
IBOT
6.29%
4.31%
3.43%
7.81%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BULD vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BULD vs. IBOT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BULD
IBOT
BULD vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BULD vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than IBOT's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 0.16% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 2.64% | 2.81% | 2.06% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BULD vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -26.50%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and IBOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BULD vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) at 6.03%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.