BULD vs. CHAT
BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BULD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. BULD is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 19.34%/yr vs 43.86%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
BULD vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 33.27% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 44.67% return.
BULD
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- 6M
- 18.22%
- YTD
- 33.27%
- 1Y
- 55.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.43%
CHAT
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- 6M
- 36.65%
- YTD
- 44.67%
- 1Y
- 75.75%
- 3Y*
- 43.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $115.12K | $412.92K | $319.97K | |
| $62.52M | $56.73M | $66.46M |
BULD vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 33.27% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 12.14% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 44.67% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and CHAT is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between BULD and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
CHAT
BULD vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BULD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.69 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 9.40 | +0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BULD vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -31.34% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.04% | -28.34% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | -31.34% | +3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.66% | -18.04% | +8.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -5.75% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 8.09% | -2.28% |
Volatility
BULD vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) is 9.58%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that BULD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 16.63% | -7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.96% | 34.48% | -9.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.79% | 39.30% | -7.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 32.47% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 32.47% | -4.11% |
BULD vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULD vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than CHAT's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 0.86% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.97% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULD and CHAT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (16.63%) compared to BULD (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 43.86% vs 19.34% for BULD. On fees, BULD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BULD has been the lower-risk option at 9.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 43.86% return vs 19.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BULD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.86% for BULD.
BULD is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHAT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULD and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer