BULD vs. GINN
BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BULD tracks the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 20.25%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.
Performance
BULD vs. GINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 36.22% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 5.00% return.
BULD
- 1D
- -4.35%
- 1M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 36.22%
- 6M
- 33.89%
- 1Y
- 64.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GINN
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.45%
- 10Y*
- —
BULD vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 36.22% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 28.27% | -12.41% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 5.00% | 20.25% | 18.71% | 29.94% | -16.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and GINN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between BULD and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
GINN
BULD vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BULD | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 1.54 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 5.39 | +7.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BULD vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and GINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -41.25% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -13.18% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | -22.25% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -4.93% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -13.28% | +5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 3.75% | +1.17% |
Volatility
BULD vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.81%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 5.81% | +6.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.55% | 12.92% | +10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.58% | 16.57% | +13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 21.44% | +6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 21.07% | +6.99% |
BULD vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULD vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than GINN's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 0.84% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.20% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULD and GINN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BULD has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs GINN's -41.25%.
On 3-year performance, BULD leads with 20.25% vs 18.28% for GINN. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BULD has performed better with a 20.25% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BULD.
GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.84% for BULD.
BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.50% for GINN.
BULD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULD and GINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer