BULD vs. GCOW
BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BULD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 18.64%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for GCOW. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
BULD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 34.29% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.18% return.
BULD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 34.29%
- 6M
- 30.65%
- 1Y
- 64.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
BULD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 34.29% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 28.27% | -12.41% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.18% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and GCOW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BULD and GCOW has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
GCOW
BULD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULD | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.44 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 5.71 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 15.05 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULD | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.52 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.59 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
BULD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -37.64% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -4.77% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | -12.35% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -2.73% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -5.84% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 1.81% | +3.07% |
Volatility
BULD vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 2.85% | +5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.34% | 7.99% | +13.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 10.81% | +17.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 13.49% | +14.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 16.20% | +11.53% |
BULD vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BULD and GCOW have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
BULD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 0.92% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.43% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULD and GCOW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BULD has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 3-year performance, BULD leads with 18.64% vs 17.41% for GCOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BULD has performed better with a 18.64% return vs 17.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BULD and GCOW have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.92% for BULD.
BULD is categorized as Technology Equities, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULD and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer