BUG vs. GXPT
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Global X - BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
BUG vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 37.85% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 17.49% return.
BUG
- 1D
- 5.93%
- 1M
- 23.10%
- 6M
- 37.67%
- YTD
- 37.85%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUG vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 37.85% | -14.36% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 17.49% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and GXPT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUG vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUG | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUG vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -18.74% | -22.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.22% | +8.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -5.23% | -9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.11% | — | — |
Volatility
BUG vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.36% | 22.98% | +9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 22.98% | +5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.48% | 22.98% | +6.50% |
BUG vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than GXPT's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and GXPT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for BUG and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer