BUG vs. IHAK
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index while IHAK tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 6.80%/yr vs 8.00%/yr for IHAK. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IHAK.
Performance
BUG vs. IHAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BUG having a 30.14% return and IHAK slightly higher at 30.23%.
BUG
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 28.99%
- YTD
- 30.14%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- —
IHAK
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- YTD
- 30.23%
- 1Y
- 22.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- —
BUG vs. IHAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 30.14% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.21% |
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 30.23% | -1.29% | 7.60% | 37.77% | -25.81% | 11.13% | 51.22% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and IHAK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BUG and IHAK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
BUG vs. IHAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUG
IHAK
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
BUG
IHAK
Communication Services
BUG
IHAK
Consumer Cyclical
BUG
IHAK
-
Consumer Defensive
BUG
IHAK
-
Healthcare
BUG
IHAK
-
Basic Materials
BUG
-
IHAK
-
Energy
BUG
-
IHAK
-
Financial Services
BUG
-
IHAK
-
Industrials
BUG
-
IHAK
Real Estate
BUG
-
IHAK
-
Utilities
BUG
-
IHAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. IHAK — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
IHAK
BUG vs. IHAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUG | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 0.99 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 2.37 | -1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUG vs. IHAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than IHAK's maximum drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and IHAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -34.42% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.16% | -22.60% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -23.48% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -34.42% | -7.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -2.43% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -10.69% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.11% | 9.41% | +6.70% |
Volatility
BUG vs. IHAK - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) at 8.26%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.49% | 8.26% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | 21.58% | +5.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.89% | 25.31% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 23.90% | +4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.40% | 24.50% | +4.90% |
BUG vs. IHAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IHAK's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. IHAK - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than IHAK's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% |
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.40% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BUG and IHAK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BUG has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to IHAK (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs IHAK's -34.42%.
On 5-year performance, IHAK leads with 8.00% vs 6.80% for BUG. On fees, IHAK is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IHAK has been the lower-risk option at 8.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IHAK has performed better with a 8.00% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHAK is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
IHAK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while IHAK tracks NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.47% for IHAK.
IHAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and IHAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer