PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
BUG vs. CIBR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

BUG vs. CIBR

Last updated May 18, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).

BUG and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2019. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both BUG and CIBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BUG or CIBR.

Correlation

The correlation between BUG and CIBR is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BUG vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BUG:

0.70

CIBR:

1.15

Sortino Ratio

BUG:

1.24

CIBR:

1.76

Omega Ratio

BUG:

1.15

CIBR:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

BUG:

0.96

CIBR:

1.48

Martin Ratio

BUG:

3.19

CIBR:

5.18

Ulcer Index

BUG:

5.97%

CIBR:

5.75%

Daily Std Dev

BUG:

24.93%

CIBR:

24.40%

Max Drawdown

BUG:

-41.66%

CIBR:

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

BUG:

-5.08%

CIBR:

-0.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 12.57% return.

BUG

YTD

8.79%

1M

9.03%

6M

7.42%

1Y

18.17%

5Y*

14.83%

10Y*

N/A

CIBR

YTD

12.57%

1M

15.62%

6M

16.41%

1Y

28.06%

5Y*

19.25%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BUG vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BUG vs. CIBR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BUG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BUG is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BUG is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BUG is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BUG is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BUG is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BUG is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
CIBR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CIBR is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BUG vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUG and CIBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

BUG vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than CIBR's 0.23% yield.

TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF		0.09%0.09%0.11%1.56%0.66%0.46%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF		0.23%0.29%0.42%0.30%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.22%0.10%0.77%0.58%

Drawdowns

BUG vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and CIBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

BUG vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 6.11%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...