PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUCK vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUCK vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUCK achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.78% return.


BUCK

1D
0.09%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.99%
6M
1.92%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.35%
1M
4.73%
YTD
6.78%
6M
6.01%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
18.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUCK vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.99%4.13%7.25%4.63%0.39%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.78%17.50%34.95%50.10%-5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BUCK and SCHG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022

0.06

BUCK vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUCK
SCHG

Financial Services

100.0%
6.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

0.8%

Healthcare

-

7.7%

Industrials

-

5.8%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Technology

-

46.3%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Financial Services

BUCK
100.0%
SCHG
6.7%

Basic Materials

BUCK

-

SCHG
1.4%

Communication Services

BUCK

-

SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BUCK

-

SCHG
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

BUCK

-

SCHG
1.7%

Energy

BUCK

-

SCHG
0.8%

Healthcare

BUCK

-

SCHG
7.7%

Industrials

BUCK

-

SCHG
5.8%

Real Estate

BUCK

-

SCHG
0.5%

Technology

BUCK

-

SCHG
46.3%

Utilities

BUCK

-

SCHG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUCK vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUCK vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUCKSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.28

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

1.51

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.33

5.04

+25.29

BUCK vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUCK Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUCK and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUCKSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.60

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

0.85

+0.63

Drawdowns

BUCK vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUCK drawdown since its inception was -5.43%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUCK and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUCKSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-34.59%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-16.41%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

-23.39%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.44%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-5.20%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

4.90%

-4.65%

Volatility

BUCK vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) is 0.70%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that BUCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUCKSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

3.61%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

11.62%

-10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

15.49%

-12.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.48%

22.26%

-18.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.48%

21.55%

-18.07%

BUCK vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUCK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUCK vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.41%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUCK and SCHG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUCK dropped -5.43% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 25.14% vs 5.27% for BUCK. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

BUCK is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BUCK and 0.04% for SCHG.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUCK and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer