BTGD vs. PHYS
BTGD (STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust) is a stock. Over the past year, BTGD returned -43.38% vs 19.28% for PHYS. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
BTGD vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -38.50% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS's -6.51% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -37.24%
- YTD
- -38.50%
- 1Y
- -43.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.87%
PHYS
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -16.79%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 1Y
- 19.28%
- 3Y*
- 26.95%
- 5Y*
- 16.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $428.43K | $383.52K | $1.03M | |
| $104.52M | $93.18M | $105.98M |
BTGD vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF | -38.50% | 34.62% | 29.32% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | -6.51% | 63.95% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and PHYS is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between BTGD and PHYS shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
PHYS
BTGD vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTGD | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 0.72 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 1.54 | -2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and PHYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.79% | -48.16% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.79% | -26.75% | -32.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.95% | -24.58% | -30.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.27% | -21.03% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.74% | 12.54% | +20.20% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 6.12%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.81% | 6.12% | +6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.87% | 21.08% | +23.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.20% | 28.87% | +29.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.65% | 18.82% | +36.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.65% | 16.43% | +39.22% |
Dividends
BTGD vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, while PHYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF | 5.47% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and PHYS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to PHYS (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -58.79% vs PHYS's -48.16%.
PHYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and PHYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer