PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
BTGD vs. PHYS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and PHYS is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

BTGD vs. PHYS

Last updated Jun 1, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS).

BTGD is an actively managed fund by Quantify Funds. It was launched on Oct 15, 2024.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BTGD or PHYS.

Performance

BTGD vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

BTGD:

56.18%

PHYS:

17.86%

Max Drawdown

BTGD:

-24.83%

PHYS:

-48.16%

Current Drawdown

BTGD:

-6.95%

PHYS:

-4.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a 32.51% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's 24.88% return.

BTGD

YTD

32.51%

1M

9.46%

6M

23.00%

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PHYS

YTD

24.88%

1M

2.49%

6M

22.92%

1Y

39.03%

3Y*

20.48%

5Y*

12.61%

10Y*

9.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF

Sprott Physical Gold Trust

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTGD vs. PHYS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BTGD
PHYS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYS is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTGD vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BTGD vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while PHYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2024
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF		0.14%0.19%
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust		0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -24.83%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and PHYS.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BTGD vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...